The Brain and Music

latest research and information

The Brain and Music header image 1

Daniel’s Music: a great resource for disabilities of all kinds

July 29th, 2011 · how the brain works, music and the brain, Uncategorized

I just saw this on the “Today Show” and wanted to share it with my readers. What a wonderful program this is in New York City. I’m sure it could be replicated elsewhere!

For centuries, the beauty, power and personal relevance of music has made it a wonderful instrument for the rehabilitation of individuals with disabilities.

By definition, Daniel’s Music Foundation is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization that provides free musical instruction to all individuals with disabilities in the NYC area. But we are much more than just a foundation we are a community that opens doors to acceptance, respect, confidence and overall well being.

The relationship we build with our members over time goes well beyond simply music. Through our On-Site, Off-Site and Outreach Programs we create the opportunity for our members to put the skills they learn into practice, in a real life setting. We have found that our programs have been extremely beneficial when we serve our members, but magic happens when our members serve others.

→ No CommentsTags: ···

Robin Williams says undergoing heart surgery “broke his barrier” and made him more emotional

February 12th, 2011 · music and the brain

 The Hollywood actor famously underwent open-heart surgery early last year, when one of his valves was replaced with that of a pig. Although Robin has recovered now, the star admits the experience hugely changed him as a person, putting him far more in touch with his feelings.

“Oh, God, you find yourself getting emotional. It breaks through your barrier, you’ve literally cracked the armour. And you’ve got no choice, it literally breaks you open. And you feel really mortal,” he told British newspaper The Guardian.

Since he first found fame in the 70s, Robin has enjoyed a long acting career and is considered one of the most hardworking stars in the movie industry. He has appeared in movies such as Mrs. Doubtfire, Dead Poets’ Society and The Fisher King.

But since experiencing ill health last year, 59-year-old Robin says he wants to take his professional life far more slowly. He regrets making so many movies during the 90s, although he doesn’t pinpoint any particular films.

Robin accepted so many roles because he was worried his fans would forget him, and he fears this made him take parts he perhaps didn’t value artistically.

“In one two-year period I made eight movies. At one point the joke was that there’s a movie out without you in it. You have this idea that you’d better keep working otherwise people will forget. And that was dangerous. And then you realise, no, actually if you take a break people might be more interested in you. Now, after the heart surgery, I’ll take it slow,” he explained.

→ No CommentsTags:

Does the brain process music and lyrics separately?

August 4th, 2010 · how the brain works, music and the brain

Your favourite song comes on the radio. You hum the tune; the lyrics remind you of someone you know. Is your brain processing the words and music separately or as one? It’s a hotly debated question that may finally have an answer.

People with aphasia, who can’t speak, can still hum a tune, suggesting music and lyrics are processed separately. Yet brain scans show that music and language activate the same areas, which might mean the brain treats them as one signal.

“There’s conflicting evidence,” says Daniela Sammler of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, Germany.

Now Sammler and her team have discovered that both arguments may be partially true. Her team worked out a way to determine when active regions were processing just music and when just lyrics, by studying a functional MRI brain scan of someone listening to songs.

Same tune, different lyrics

The team knew that when neurons process the same stimulus repeatedly, their response to it decreases over time. “They become kind of lazy,” says Sammler.

She reasoned that if she varied just the tune and kept the lyrics the same, areas showing a decline in activity must be processing lyrics. If she varied just the lyrics, areas showing a decline must be processing the tune, while any regions declining when both the tune and lyrics are repeated must be processing both.

The team wrote four different sets of six songs and played these to 12 volunteers while scanning their brains. In one set, all songs had different melodies and lyrics (listen to these here). In another, the melodies were different but the lyrics were the same (listen to these here), while in the third set, the opposite was true (listen to these here). The fourth set were identical to each other (listen here).

From the fMRI scans the team worked out that one particular part of the brain – the superior temporal sulcus (STS) – was responding to the songs. In the middle of the STS, the lyrics and tune were being processed as a single signal. But in the anterior STS, only the lyrics seemed to be processed.

Complex separation

Her team couldn’t find an area specific to processing tunes. This may be because no individual, complex processing occurs for melody, although it might in professional musicians, says Sammler.

She concludes that the brain first deals with music and lyrics together. Then, after passing through the mid-STS more complex processing kicks in, such as understanding what lyrics mean, and the two are treated separately. “The more they are processed, the more they are separated,” she says.

Stefan Koelsch at the University of Sussex, UK, says he “likes the paper very much”.

But Martin Braun of Neuroscience of Music, an independent research centre in Karlstad, Sweden, isn’t convinced that the brain is processing both together at any point. “Activation of a particular brain area by different stimuli doesn’t imply that these different stimuli are integrated,” he argues. “The stimuli might just have a similar effect on the area.”

Sammler’s team argues that the degree of the decline in activation in the mid-STS was different from what you would expect if both were being processed individually and simultaneously.

  • 22:00 09 March 2010 by Jessica Hamzelou
  • For similar stories, visit the The Human Brain Topic Guide

Journal reference: Journal of Neuroscience, DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2751-09.2010

→ 2 CommentsTags:

Recent Research on Issues Regarding music in the PACU

July 29th, 2010 · music and the brain

Part of my job involves reviewing, collecting and commenting on recent research in the many specialties of Music Medicine.  I thought you’d definitely want to see this one!  Please add your own comments and feel free to ask me any questions that come to mind!  Thank you!

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Aug;25(4):208-13. Epub 2009 May 14.

Patients’ perception of music versus ordinary sound in a postanaesthesia care unit: a randomised crossover trial.

Fredriksson AC, Hellström L, Nilsson U.

Dep. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Malmoe University Hospital, Sweden.

Abstract

We performed an experimental single-blind crossover design study in a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU): (i) to test the hypothesis that patients will experience a higher degree of wellbeing if they listen to music compared to ordinary PACU sounds during their early postoperative care, (ii) to determine if there is a difference over time, and (iii) to evaluate the importance of the acoustic environment and whether patients prefer listening to music during their stay. Two groups received a three-phase intervention: one group (n=23) experienced music-ordinary sound-music and the second group (n=21) experienced ordinary sound-music-ordinary sound. Each period lasted 30 min, and after each period the patients assessed their experience of the sound. The results demonstrated a significant difference (p<0.001) between groups in the proportions of patients reporting that the acoustic environment was of great importance for their wellbeing during the three-phase intervention, and most participants (n=36 versus n=8) noticed that they were exposed to different sounds during the PACU period. The results also revealed that most participants (n=32) preferred listening to music versus listening to ordinary sound (n=3) while in the PACU (p<0.001). These findings promote use of listening to music to establish a healing environment for patients in a postanaesthesia care unit.

→ No CommentsTags:

How Music “Moves Us”

July 15th, 2010 · music and the brain

Browsing the internet and came across this excellent article!  It’s from www.medicalnewstoday.com.  Enjoy!
Have you ever accidentally pulled your headphone socket out while listening to music? What happens when the music stops? Psychologists believe that our brains continuously predict what is going to happen next in a piece of music. So, when the music stops, your brain may still have expectations about what should happen next. A new paper published in NeuroImage predicts that these expectations should be different for people with different musical experience and sheds light on the brain mechanisms involved.

Research by Marcus Pearce Geraint Wiggins, Joydeep Bhattacharya and their colleagues at Goldsmiths, University of London has shown that expectations are likely to be based on learning through experience with music. Music has a grammar, which, like language, consists of rules that specify which notes can follow which other notes in a piece of music. According to Pearce: “the question is whether the rules are hard-wired into the auditory system or learned through experience of listening to music and recording, unconsciously, which notes tend to follow others.”

The researchers asked 40 people to listen to hymn melodies (without lyrics) and state how expected or unexpected they found particular notes. They simulated a human mind listening to music with two computational models. The first model uses hard-wired rules to predict the next note in a melody. The second model learns through experience of real music which notes tend to follow others, statistically speaking, and uses this knowledge to predict the next note.

The results showed that the statistical model predicts the listeners’ expectations better than the rule-based model. It also turned out that expectations were higher for musicians than for non-musicians and for familiar melodies which also suggests that experience has a strong effect on musical predictions.

In a second experiment, the researchers examined the brain waves of a further 20 people while they listened to the same hymn melodies. Although in this experiment the participants were not explicitly informed about the locations of the expected and unexpected notes, their brain waves in responses to these notes differed markedly. Typically, the timing and location of the brain wave patterns in response to unexpected notes suggested that they stimulate responses that synchronise different brain areas associated with processing emotion and movement. On these results, Bhattacharya commented, “… as if music indeed ‘moves’ us!”

These findings may help scientists to understand why we listen to music. “It is thought that composers deliberately confirm and violate listeners’ expectations in order to communicate emotion and aesthetic meaning,” said Pearce. Understanding how the brain generates expectations could illuminate our experience of emotion and meaning when we listen to music.

Source: Goldsmiths, University of London

→ No CommentsTags: